Questioning submission that 1 third constitution amendment provides the reservation to the EWS that is economically weaker sections without any guard rails. In the case of reservation for backward classes, the conditions like maintenance of administration and their efficiency are prescribed in article 335. These are the words of the supreme court on Tuesday, which added the constitution will not provide for any search guard rail in the case of a reservation for women.
It is also an immutable fact that when you raise the status of women to employment and there was no guard rail. The backward class commission, or SC ST commission, is a kind of constitutional mechanism that is not provided. The accident of representation is also not spoken in the article and now it is a reservation set by the five-judge constitution and also sets the bench sharing petitions by challenging the 103rd amendment.
He also ended that this is just to flag when the possible way to look at it and the original constellation also thought of a kind of restorative or representational mechanism which did not depend on this kind of identification. Article 15 also enables the state to make special provisions for children and women. Justice Bhat was responding to the submissions by the senior advocate Meenakshi Arora and told that the bench presided by the chief justice of India Mr. Lalit in the case of EWS quota.
- Who’s the senior advocate in this case?
Ans. Meenakshi Arora
- Who’s the chief justice of India?
Ans. U U Lalit
- Which is this constitutional amendment?
Ans. 103rd constitution amendment